Tuesday, 8 November 2016
Indian Military Veterans
A number of Circulars have been issued by the CDA (P) Allahabad on the subject. In most of the cases, the arrears are identified by the CDA Circular Numbers.
Therefore, all the readers are requested to visit the website http://www.pcdapension.nic.in first, and understand what are the circulars, and what are arrears involved.
1. CDA Cir.560 (For arrears of Spl. Family Pension, Disability Pension etc. for the period from 1.1.2006 to 23.9.2012).
2. CDA Cir.555 for OROP revision and arrears from 1.7.2014.
3. CDA Cir.547 for Arrears from 1.1.2006 to 23.9.2012 on a/c of 6 CPC anamolies.
4. CDA Cir.567 for Arrears of Enhanced Family pension from 1.1.2006 to 23.9.2012.
5. CDA Cir.568 for De-linking arrears from 1.1.2006 30. To 30.6.2014.
6. CDA Cir.570 for 7 CPC arrears and revision of pension from 1.1.2016.
7. A Special provision (Menu) for 80 years pensioners to know their arrears with Additional Pension.
The list is never ending. We are continuously updating our website. The main idea is that every pensioner must know his entitlement. It has been made so simple that a Pensioner or a Family Pensioner need to know the following information only to know their pension arrears and revised pension. It is emphasized that every pensioner should keep the following information ready every time.
1. Name of the Pensioner
2. Rank of the Pensioner.
3. Qualifying service.
4. Group of the Pensioner
5. Date of Birth of a pensioner.
6. Date of Death of pensioner in case of Family pension.
7. Name of the Bank, Branch and Account Number.
Indian Military Veterans
After the 1971 war, the entire country was rejoicing and celebrating the win of India over Pakistan. This war was considered one of the greatest which changed the geography of the sub continent. The war which earned the title Durga to Indira Gandhi! The armed forces were feted everywhere and appreciated for their impeccable service and courage. Although our country lost 4000 soldiers and 10,000 were wounded and scared for life, the pain was masked in the victory of the country. They had to continue their life in the forbidding world.
OROP ROW : NO END IN SIGHT, AS BABUS HOLD SWAY ;: Today the entire OROP controversy is quintessentially a battle between a section of the military and the civil bureaucracy.
Indian Military Veterans
Simply put, Orop means that anyone superannuating from the armed forces will receive the same pension as a person of similar rank and length of service, no matter when they retire. Moreover, every time pension rates are enhanced, the increase will automatically be passed on to all pensioners new and old.
This scheme was put into effect in February 2016 and since then more than two million military pensioners and their widows have received enhanced pensions, which are reported to have cost the exchequer more than Rs 5,500 crores. About one lakh more pensioners, many of them old and with lost records, are yet to receive pension benefits.
However, a section of retired armed forces officers has rejected the government’s Orop scheme and resumed their agitation. One outcome of this was the recent tragic suicide of an ex-serviceman.
The Orop agitation now has spiralled into a full-blown political war with the Opposition targeting the government for not fulfilling its pledge to the armed forces.
Instead of easing heightened emotions, the government has blundered by making insensitive statements and trying to run down the agitation as an Opposition-sponsored one.
The defence minister, far from assuaging the Orop agitators, has hardened his position by claiming that the vast majority of servicemen support the government’s implementation of Orop.
This points to a failure to connect with the military. Reports suggest that the continued agitation is causing confusion and concern within the military ranks as the reward of a lifetime pension is primarily what attracts recruits.
A significant section of retired service officers, it must be noted, do not support the current agitation or the manner in which it is being conducted. They point out that in every negotiation there must be some give and take and no one party should expect 100 per cent satisfaction. They maintain that unlike past governments, the Narendra Modi government has fulfilled 90 per cent of the Orop demands and that hundreds of thousands of ex-servicemen and military widows have benefited from the increased rollout of pensions.
These officers believe that their agitating co-officers should acknowledge the fact that the reasons behind the government’s inability to meet every demand is due to fiscal constraints and not an anti-military mindset.
They also argue that military officers today cannot be considered impecunious by any means. Pensions today are generous by most standards and retired personnel enjoy free medical benefits, subsidised canteen and other facilities, which civilians do not. All this, say the proponents of the Orop agitation, is beside the point.
They claim what the present government has implemented is a watered-down version of Orop. The agitators among other things want pensions to be revised every year instead of every two years (compared to every 10 years earlier) and oppose the exclusion of Orop for personnel who opt for premature retirement.
The military, being a highly pyramidical organisation, compulsorily retires almost 90 per cent of its personnel before they are 40 years old. A great percentage of the older ones who remain do not have promotion prospects and many of them seek premature retirement. For thousands of such officers, pension remains a prime concern.
However, the Orop agitation is not so much a matter of detail, of how much the government has given or not given, whether the Orop idea has been implemented in spirit or, as civilian bureaucrats maintain, an issue reflective of the insatiable greed of a group of service personnel.
The problem is the bureaucracy and its blatant machinations since 1973 when the Third Pay Commission gave the first body blow to the military. Both pensions and salaries of the military were slashed while those of the civil services hiked. The latest pay commission continues along the same lines and has been rejected by the service chiefs.
Since then there has been a growing feeling in the military, particularly the Army, that their status and emoluments relative to the civil bureaucracy have deliberately and systematically been eroded.
This feeling finally snowballed into the full-fledged agitation in 2009 with senior retired officers coming out in the streets. This was an agitation without parallel and its continuance remains a great source of worry for ordinary citizens.
Ironically, issues that are only tangentially connected to Orop are currently agitating ex-servicemen and giving a fillip to Orop agitators.
The two specific issues of great emotive value for the military are disability pension and its status vis-à-vis the civil bureaucracy.
On October 18, 2016, a joint secretary in the ministry of defence reportedly issued a circular according to which all senior officers were downgraded against their civilian counterparts. Thus, a major general who was earlier equivalent to a joint director was downgraded to a principal director, a colonel to a joint director from director and so on.
Some years earlier, Pranab Mukherjee had suggested upgrading the status of military officers as compared to their civilian counterparts, but the bureaucracy ensured the opposite happened.
The defence minister was told by his bureaucrats that nothing had changed and that the reports of the downgrading of ranks were false. The minister believed them.
What made matters worse was that the administrative diktats downgrading the military coincided with the “surgical strikes” carried out by the Army in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. This was tantamount to waving a red rag before an already unsettled military.
Similarly, disability pensions were slashed on the very day of the surgical strikes, causing huge resentment in the military. A military life is inherently dangerous and injuries leading to disabilities can destroy a soldier’s life.
Unlike civilian employees, thousands of soldiers get booted out of the military prematurely if they fall short of medical requirements. A disability pension is the only way to compensate these unfortunate men who have lost out.
Yet, a bureaucratic order on September 29 this year introduced a “slab system” for disability pension under which an officer would get a flat rate of Rs 27,000 per month, a junior commissioned officer Rs 17,000 and all other ranks Rs 12,000. This effectively lowered actual payments made under the earlier percentage system where disability pension was calculated as a percentage of last pay drawn.
Mischievous bureaucrats increasingly pose a grave threat to national integrity. They thrive in a system that allows too much power in their hands and remain unaccountable to all except their minister. If the minister can be “managed”, the bureaucrats can get away with anything.
Today the entire Orop controversy is quintessentially a battle between a section of the military and the civil bureaucracy. To make matters worse this fight has escalated into a full-scale political one, and will stay that way.
It will require great statesmanship to rid the military community of its collective angst and steer the military establishment away from the brink. Sadly, given the current political climate, it seems unlikely anything like that will happen.
(SOURCE : DECCAN CHRONICLE)
at 7:14 am
Materernity Leave increased to 270 Days for Women Employees – TN Govt issued orders
ABSTRACT Tamil Nadu Fundamental Rules – Rule 101(a) – Maternity Leave – Enhancement of maternity leave from 6 months (180 days) to 9 months (270 days) – Orders issued
PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS (FR.III) DEPARTMENT
G.O.(Ms.) No.105 Dated: 07.11.2016
Read: 1. G.O.(Ms.) No.51, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (FR-III) Department, dated 16.05.2011. 2. G.O.(Ms.) No.61, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (FR-III) Department, dated 16.06.2011. 3. G.O.(Ms.) No.138, Personnel and Administrative Reforms (FR-IV) Department, dated 19.11.2013.
In the Government orders first and second read above, orders were issued enhancing the maternity leave from 90 days to 180 days to married women Government servants, with less than two surviving children, which may be spread over from the pre-confinement rest to post-confinement recuperation, with full pay, at the option of the women Government Servant. Accordingly, in the Government Order third read above, Rule 101(a) of the Fundamental Rules was also amended.
2. The Government, after careful consideration, based on the announcement made in the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly by the Hon’ble Chief Minister on 01.09.2016, under rule 110 of the Legislative Assembly Rules order that the maternity leave admissible to married women Government Servants with less than two surviving children, which is 6 months (180 days) at present, be enhanced to 9 months (270 days), with full pay, which may be spread over from the pre-confinement rest to post-confinement recuperation, with full pay, at the option of the women Government Servant. The women Government Servants who proceeded on maternity leave, prior to the date of issue of this order and continue to be on that leave as of now, are also eligible for availing maternity leave upto 9 months (270 days), in total.
3. Necessary amendments to the Fundamental Rules will be issued separately.
(BY ORDER OF THE GOVERNOR) S.SWARNA SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
at 7:03 am
- ► May (20)
- ► March (42)
- ► February (44)
- ► December (32)
- ▼ Nov 08 (5)
- ► October (26)
- ► September (28)
- ► July (68)
- ► June (107)
- ► May (75)
- ► April (85)
- ► March (182)
- ► February (102)
- ► January (96)
- ► December (18)
- ► November (54)
- ► October (54)
- ► September (143)
- ► July (144)
- ► June (50)
- ► May (145)
- ► March (79)
- ► February (113)
- ► September (135)
- ► August (140)
- ► July (44)
- ► April (55)
- ► February (43)
- ► December (59)
- ► November (12)
- ► September (35)
- ► August (43)
- ► July (51)
- ► June (24)
- ► July (59)
- ► June (67)
- ► May (40)
- ► March (40)
- ► February (35)
- ► December (36)
- ► October (55)
- ► September (94)
- ► August (31)
- ► July (12)
The contents posted on these Web Site are personal reflections of the Viewers and do not reflect the views of the "Indian Military Veterans- Web" Team. Neither the "Indian Military Veterans -Web" nor the individual authors of any material on these Web accept responsibility for any loss or damage caused (including through negligence), which anyone may directly or indirectly suffer arising out of use of or reliance on information contained in or accessed through these Web.
This is not an official Web site. This forum is run by team of ex- Indian Army, Veterans for social networking of Indian Defence Veterans. It is not affiliated to or officially recognized by the MoD or the AHQ, or Government/ State.
The Indian Military Veterans Forum will endeavor to edit/ delete any material which is considered offensive, undesirable and or impinging on national security. The WebTeam is very conscious of potentially questionable content. However, where a content is posted and between posting and removal from the Web in such cases, the act does not reflect either the condoning or endorsing of said material by the Team.
Web Moderator: Capt KS Ramaswamy (Retd)